Supreme Court denies Oklahoma’s appeal to restore $4 million in family planning funds

white concrete building near green grass field under blue sky during daytime

The Supreme Court has recently made a significant decision that has ramifications for Oklahoma’s funding for family planning services. In a brief order issued on Tuesday, the Court denied the state’s request to reinstate $4 million in federal family planning funds after Oklahoma’s government determined it would not allocate the money for elective abortions.

In the context of this ongoing legal battle, the high court’s ruling means that Oklahoma will continue to face challenges in receiving federal Title X funds. These funds are meant to support family planning services, but the state’s refusal to comply with obligations regarding abortion referrals has created a barrier. A notable detail is that Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch expressed a willingness to grant the injunction, but that wasn’t enough to change the overall outcome.

To understand the backdrop of this ruling, we need to look back to October 2021, when the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) introduced a rule allowing Title X funds to support clinics that provided abortion counseling referrals. This rule was a shift from an earlier directive under the Trump administration. Then in early 2022, following the Supreme Court’s landmark decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, Oklahoma began to raise objections to a federal requirement mandating that these funds facilitate counseling and referrals for abortions.

HHS had offered Oklahoma a workaround — the option to give patients seeking pregnancy counseling a general hotline number rather than direct referrals to abortion services. However, the state rejected this alternative, leading to the termination of their grant. As legal expert Amy Howe elaborates, this led Oklahoma to seek justice in federal court to challenge HHS’s decision and demand the renewal of the grant for the upcoming 2024-25 period.

Ultimately, an initial court ruling and then a decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit denied Oklahoma’s request for immediate relief. It’s also worth noting that earlier in March 2021, a collective of 19 states, led by Ohio, sought to intervene against the Biden administration’s changes to Title X funding rules.

This confusion surrounds the federal program, which, since its inception in 1970, has excluded funds from being used for programs that consider abortion a method of family planning. There does exist a national debate regarding public funding for family planning services, with some advocating for broader access, yet a significant number of states maintain a consensus against funding elective abortions.

This recent Supreme Court decision not only reflects ongoing tensions over state and federal roles in funding family planning but also illustrates the complicated landscape surrounding reproductive rights in the United States today.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *